Authorization Status & Follow-up
Keep a pending authorization connected to its reference number, payer response and next follow-up. When the payer asks for more information, route the request with the original service context.
How the work moves.
A submitted request still needs an owner, a status and a next action.
- 01
Organize pending requests and reference numbers.
Identify the exact request and preserve its reference information.
- 02
Retrieve status through an authorized channel.
Record the status, source and response time so a pending label has useful context.
- 03
Route additional-information requests and deadlines.
Assign payer questions and deadlines to the team responsible for resolving them.
A request,
with its context intact.
A payer response says an authorization is pending additional information. The response requests an updated order before the planned service date.
Fictional example · No patient data or external action
- Status
- Additional information requested
- Requested item
- Updated order
- Follow-up
- Route to the ordering team with the payer deadline
Start with the
right information.
Keep these details with the request so the next person can review the work without repeating the intake.
- Authorization reference and submission context
- Patient, payer and planned service
- Status responses from an authorized source
- Payer deadlines and responsible staff team
About this workflow.
How is a payer status kept trustworthy?
Retain the response source, time and reference number. A prior response is historical context and should not be presented as a fresh payer determination.
Does an approval automatically change the appointment?
No. Authorization status and scheduling are separate records. Staff reviews any implications for the service, timing or patient communication.
Related workflows.
View all workflowsMake more room for care.
Tell us which work is taking time from your team. We’ll walk through the workflow, its review steps and the connections your practice needs.
Get started